I didn’t say he needed something to bring him back to competitiveness. The entire point of the post is that it seems from his comments he’s not currently enjoying the game of golf or being on tour. His comments don’t scream longevity. It’s clear you didn’t understand the message of the post or appreciate the psychology of sport.
I reference Michael Jordan in the first paragraph; if you’re old enough, you’ll recall him being the most competitive player in the league and retiring twice after winning a championship (burned out). MJ at 60 regrets not going for 8+ titles in a row. Jack Nicklaus played major-winning golf, with 5 children, from the early 60’s until the mid 80’s. If you’re a student of the game, you’ll recall Jack also had thoughts of quitting early but adapted in ways to keep him competitive (and when I say competitive, I mean the desire to compete, not his ability to compete, which you deeply misinterpreted and I’m not even sure you know the difference).
Yes, Scottie won another major because he’s the best player in the world and it isn’t even close. However, if you understand athletes and what drives them, Scottie’s comments are understandable, but there’s a concern there. We want Scottie going for all-time records, not stepping away in his early 30’s. We want double digit majors, not 4. What stops Scottie from being an all-time great at this point is himself, not others.
So before your next hot take, maybe do a second or third read through of the post. Something else you don’t seem to understand is burnout. Athletes win all the time while burnt out, but you can’t operate forever on a burned out level. I’m certain Scottie will continue to take steps to address that, likely with reduced tournaments going forward as an example of preventative measures.
One last thing, folks on here should stop comparing Scottie to Tiger and realize that he’s actually potentially the next Jack Nicklaus. Scottie’s game is Jack’s adapted to the modern game, not even addressing the other similar aspects of the players.