Pnwpingi210

Yup you just have to predict the likely hood this will happen. 1 in 10, 1 in 100.

Yeah. Good enough to satisfy you. For it to have value I’d say we need to *either convert the male cap to female, or female to male. Now caps normalized *Then pull up a statically probability chart for likely to shoot by handicap. *Then pick a course, and tees Then we might have something to discuss….. but I’m not doing all that work at this point, if you want to have it and share back with us

How many strokes does extreme course knowledge give the members an advantage of? If have to think it’s more strokes the harder it plays.

No. Look man if you want to use this to develop “red’s betting odds”, go ahead. Everybody has an exceptional day in golf, and everybody has a bad day in golf. It’s a volatile game. Can a 0 handicap beat a plus 4 of any gender if they play enough games, sure. But it’s not happening often and you win a ton of money if you put it on the plus 4 and let it ride.

You’re right! I heard and read the same chart wrong earlier

Agree to disagree It’s all funny math and the calculation are so vague and non specific it’s got little value to predict an outcome. we’d have to do some conversions of caps to normalizing, then pick tees and a course and course setup for it to have any value. this is why I didn’t want to go down this path cause throwing out funny numbers doesn’t hold water, and to really calculate something that has any value is too time consuming.

Agree.

Where are you getting this? ask golf nut and the marketing stuff are both reporting less bounce and a sharper leading edge on the s1 vs the 241 (which was mizunos most bounce and blunted leading edge in a blade in some time)

I think a scratch shoots their “cap” about 15-20% of the time. I don’t have tbe calculation for that, but know it’s been posted in the forums. so take the 40, make it 20 and the use the rest of the calls and That gets us to 5% of the time they could clip a lpga tour member. That seems reasonable given. 1 out of 20 feels right

What statiscal data? what course? what tees?

My mp32 are 2 degrees of bounce stock at 5 or 6 iron I think so it would be zero bounce minimum. these are supposed to be back to mizuno low bounce and sharp leading edge heritage.

Yup. at some point in the set I bet the bounce would go negative 🤣

I think it was like a game of telephone/rumor mill that the s4 legend began

Oops, I thought you scenario above was for the plus 1.8. That I would think is reasonable. I don’t think the average scratch beats the average lpga player 1 out of 10 ten times on any course. maybe if you picks Kyle Berkshire vs the shortest lpga tour member on the longest and widest course out there.

I hear you, but I wouldn’t call that decent chance. if I blindly take the lpga player I’m way way up over 10 matches…..

Sure man. the thread was about scratch golfers. some dude moved the goal posts to plus 1.8 golfers. I realize that means they can shoot the scores to back it up. I’m not sure what your going on about?

Pro v1.

I don’t mean that. I mean a +1.8 handicap amateur golfer. Drop the “club” if that brings in some other caveat

That’s what I meant. Amatuer +1.8 handicap that plays at you local club

Agree I think the modus 120x is most similar to project x lz I think the modus 120 tx is like a staper 130x

Exactly. I thought for sure there’s an app that does it. Grint, 18 birdies, ghin app

Too many variables like course rating, weather, what the person ate that day.. in all seriousness, isn’t there a golf app out that lets you plug in these variables to see who gets strokes in a head to head match? same course same tees men’s 0 handicap womens + 6 handicap

Cause any number is just a made up funny number. Nobody’s claiming to have an algorithm here. Unless you do and aren’t sharing

Somebody should plug this into the ghin app and see if the male (0 handicap male) or lpga pro (lets say women’s +6) gets strokes

I’d take the lpga pro.